AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
Judgment
5 paragraphs · 95 words
1.
The view taken by the District Judge is in accordance with Babshetti v. Venkataramana 3 B. 154 and Ranga v. Suba Hegde 4 B. 473 which
was approved in The Secretary of State v. Fernandes 30 M, 375; 17 M.L.J. 337; 2 M.L.T. 320. Even if the assessment was increased in
consequence of improvement made by the mulganidar, we do not think this makes any difference, and we are not referred to any case in this
country in which it has been held that it does.
2.
The second appeal is dismissed with costs.
