High CourtsDivision Bench(2023) 08 DEL CK 1724

Gulati Enterprises vs Union Of India & Ors.

Delhi High Court · Decided on 9 August 2023

HON’BLE JUDGES
Vibhu Bakhru, J · Amit Mahajan, J
CASE NUMBER
W.P.(C) 11223/2022 & CM APPL. 19805/2023

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

14 paragraphs · 380 words

Vibhu Bakhru, J.

1.

The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, impugning orders dated 13.08.2019, 21.07.2020 & 04.08.2021 whereby the petitioner’s bank accounts were attached. It is pointed out that in addition to the orders mentioned in the present petition, the Commissioner of CGST, Belapur had passed another order dated 05.08.2022, which in effect further extended the period of provisional attachment. One year has passed since the said order was passed and in terms of Section 83(2) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereafter ‘the CGST Act’), the said order is no longer operative.

2.

Mr. Hossain, learned counsel for respondent no.2 states that the Commissionerate at Belapur has not passed any further orders of provisional attachment of the petitioner’s assets after 05.08.2022.

3.

A tabular statement indicating the details of the orders of provisional attachment passed in respect of the petitioner’s bank accounts is set out below:-

S.NO.Bank Account Details1ST Provisional Attachment Order Date: 13.08.20192nd Provisional Attachment Order Date: 21.07.20193rd Provisional Attachment Order Date: 04.08.20214th Provisional Attachment Order Date: 05.08.2022
1.Yes Bank Ltd. Dwarka Branch Account No.0236 6370000 0200Order Reference No.V/AE/B el12-86/Gr.A/Gu lati/20-19-20/1746Order Reference No.V/AE/Bel /Gr.E/12-27/Ritesh Creations/En q/19-20/198Reference No.V/AE/Bel /Gr.E/12-27/Ritesh Creations/En q/ 19-20/3860Order Reference No.V/AE/Bel/ Gr.E/12-27/Ritesh Creations/Enq/ 19-20/2451
2.HDFC Bank Ltd. PatparganjOrder Reference No.V/AE/B el12-86/Gr.A/GuOrder Reference No.V/AE/Bel /Gr.E/12-27/RiteshOrder Reference No.V/AE/Bel /Gr.E/12-27/RiteshOrder Reference No.V/AE/Bel/ Gr.E/12-27/Ritesh
Industrial Area Account No.2840 7630000 697lati/20-19-20/1748Creations/En q/19-20/200Creations/En q/19-20/3858Creations/Enq/ 19-20/2449
3.HDFC Bank Ltd. Patparganj Industrial Area Account No.2840 1530001 344Order Reference No.V/AE/B el12-86/Gr.A/Gu lati/20-19-20/745Order Reference No.V/AE/Bel /Gr.E/12-27/Ritesh Creations/En q/19-20/197Order Reference No.V/AE/Bel /Gr.E/12-27/Ritesh Creations/En q/19-20/3861Order Reference No.V/AE/Bel/ Gr.E/12-27/Ritesh Creations/Enq/ 19-20/2452
4.

Since the order dated 05.08.2022 – which was the last provisional order passed by the Commissionerate at Belapur – is no longer operative, the present petition has been rendered academic.

5.

In the given circumstances, we consider it apposite to dispose of the present petition by directing the concerned bank (respondent no.3) to not interdict the operation of the petitioner’s bank account on account of any of the orders of the provisional attachment that are mentioned above.

6.

The petition is disposed of the in the aforesaid directions.

7.

It is clarified that if any further order of provisional attachment is passed, the petitioner is not precluded to assail the same.

8.

All rights and contentions of the parties are reserved.