Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2023) 04 NCLT CK 0508

Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority vs Anil Mata

National Company Law Tribunal · Decided on 12 April 2023

HON’BLE JUDGES
Bachu Venkat Balaram Das, Member (J) · L.N. Gupta, Member (T)
CASE NUMBER
IA. No. 4869/ND/2022 in Company Petition No. (IB)-995(ND)/2018

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

10 paragraphs · 506 words

The present IA No. 4869 of 2022 has been filed by Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority (hereinafter referred to as the “GNIDA”), through its Manager (hereinafter referred to as the “Applicant/Objector”), under Section 60(5) of IBC, 2016, read with Rule 11 of NCLT Rules, 2016 seeking the following reliefs:

“a)

Reject the Resolution Plan put up for its approval in IA. No. 1489/2020; and

b)

Direct the Resolution Professional to serve a copy of application bearing IA. No. 1489/2020 for approval of Resolution Plan upon the Applicant/Objector; and

c)

Pass any such other order/direction which it may deem fit in the interest of justice.”

2.

To put the facts succinctly, the underlying main Petition CP (IB)-995/ND/2018 was filed by M/s VMS Equipment Pvt. Ltd. against the Corporate Debtor namely, M/s Primrose Infratech Pvt. Ltd. under Section 7 of IBC, 2016, which was admitted vide Order dated 21.12.2018 of this Adjudicating Authority and the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) in respect of the Corporate Debtor was initiated. The Corporate Debtor at present is represented through its RP Sh. Anil Matta.

3.

The present application is filed by the GNIDA as an objection to the Resolution Plan. It is contended by GNIDA that it is a secured creditor in terms of Section 3(30) and 3(31) of IBC, 2016, since, there is a security interest created in its favour by virtue of Section 13 and 13A of the Uttar Pradesh Industrial Area Development Act, 1976, over the property.

4.

It has also been brought to our notice that the claim of the GNIDA was re-classified from financial debt to operational debt by the RP, a decision which has been upheld by the Hon'ble NCLAT.

5.

On perusal of the documents on record, it is observed that certain material facts, which are necessary for adjudication of the Application, are not mentioned in the application. Accordingly, in the interest of justice, we consider it appropriate to direct both parties to indicate the following by filing an Additional Affidavit within 10 days from today:

i)

The date on which the debt of GNIDA became due and payable for the very first time and thereafter, the financial year-wise, in a tabular format; ii) The payment due dates/schedule for the lease rentals vis-a-vis the details of lease rentals paid and defaulted by the CD (a) prior to the initiation of CIRP, and (b) after the commencement of CIRP, in a tabular format. iii) Whether the Corporate Debtor committed any default in respect of any of the other dues (a) prior to the initiation of the CIR process (b) post-initiation of the CIR process, in a tabular format. iv) The details of the property, over which GNIDA is claiming to have its security interest, and the date from which it is claimed to have been created along with supporting documents, if any.

6.

Since the main prayer in the application is for seeking rejection of the Resolution Plan, which is listed before the Regular Bench, therefore, list this application on 24.04.2023 before the Regular Bench.