Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2022) 03 NCLT CK 0080

Gracefull Vincom Pvt Ltd vs Registrar Of Companies West Bengal

National Company Law Tribunal · Decided on 28 March 2022

HON’BLE JUDGES
Rohit Kapoor, Member (J) · Harish Chander Suri, Member (T)
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Appeal No. 34/KB/2021

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

13 paragraphs · 459 words

Rohit Kapoor, Member (Judicial)

1.

This is an appeal preferred by Income Tax Officer, Ward 6, Kolkata under Sec.252(1) of the Companies Act, 2013 for restoration of the name of the company Gracefull Vinicom Private Limited in the register of Registrar of Companies, W.B.

2.

Ld. Counsel for the appellant appears. No one from the Office of the ROC, WB appears.

3.

Court Notice was issued to the ROC, WB and other respondents including the company. Affidavit of service proving service of notice is filed. We are satisfied with proper delivery of notice. However, there is no representation by any of the directors of the struck off company.

4.

The appellant contends that the name of the Respondent company had been struck off by the ROC, W.B. in compliance of the provisions under Sec.248 (1) of the Companies Act, 2013 thereby the name of the respondent company had been removed from the Register of Companies and the said company was dissolved.

5.

The appellant further contends that the proceedings under Section(s)156 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 are pending for the Assessment Year(s)2014-15 against the Company and during the pendency of proceedings, the name of the respondent company had been struck off. Aggrieved by the order of striking off the name of the company, this application was filed by the Income Tax Officer praying for restoration of the respondent company to the register of Registrar of Companies and further to rectify the Master Data by modifying the status from ‘struck off’ to ‘active’.

6.

It has been contended by the appellant, in the circumstances, if name of the company is not restored, it will cause great prejudice to the appellant and also loss to the Revenue.

7.

The ROC, W.B. has filed his report submitting that it has no objection to the application being allowed.

8.

Upon hearing the arguments advanced on the side of the appellant and the Ld. ROC, West Bengal, we are satisfied that the name of the respondent company is required to be restored to the Register of Companies since proceedings under Section(s)156 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the Assessment Year(s)2014-15 are pending.

9.

In the result, the appeal is allowed by restoring the name of the company in the register of Registrar of Companies, West Bengal with a direction to modify the status of the company from ‘struck off’ to ‘active’ within 30 days from the date of receipt of this order.

10.

Appeal No.34/KB/2021 is allowed and disposed of.

11.

There shall be no order as to costs.

12.

Free copy of the order will be provided to the appellant forthwith. Urgent certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities.