High CourtsSingle Bench(2021) 08 UK CK 0013

Goswami Automobiles vs District Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission & Another

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 2 August 2021

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (M/S) No. 938 Of 2021

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

14 paragraphs · 215 words

Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J

1.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is not challenging the order passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission,

Haridwar on merits. He further submits that the writ petition was filed in the month of April, 2021, as the State Consumer Disputes Redressal

Commission, Dehradun was not functioning for want of quorum. By the order dated 20.03.2021, impugned in this writ petition, District Consumer

Disputes Redressal Commission, Haridwar has directed sealing of the showroom of the petitioner.

2.

It is a fact that petitioner has challenged the said order by filing Revision Petition before the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission,

Dehradun.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has apprised the Court that the next date fixed before the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission,

Dehradun is 04.08.2021.

4.

In such view of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of with a request to State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Dehradun to consider

petitioner’s stay application filed alongwith his Revision petition on the next date fixed i.e. on 4.08.2021 or on any other day within 15 days

thereafter.

5.

For a period of three weeks or till disposal of petitioner’s stay application, whichever is earlier, the order 20.03.2021 passed by District

Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Haridwar, shall be kept in abeyance.