Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2024) 07 NCLT CK 1605

Gospell Digital Technology Co. Ltd. vs Altius Digital Private Limited

National Company Law Tribunal · Decided on 4 July 2024

HON’BLE JUDGES
Prabhat Kumar, Member (Technical) · Virendrasingh Bisht, Member (Judicial)
CASE NUMBER
IA 3398/2024, IA3440/2024 IN C.P. (IB)/137(MB)2023

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

12 paragraphs · 310 words

IA 3398/2024

1.

Ld. Counsel for the applicant Adv. Umang Mehta i/b by Dhruv Liladhar & Co. is present.

2.

Ld. Counsel Adv. Urfi is present for the respondent.

3.

This application is seeking extension in the CIRP period as well as exclusion of time from the CIRP period. The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the CoC in its 5th meeting held on 15.06.2024 has resolved to seek extension of 90 days and exclusion of 51 days with a vote of 99.98%. The counsel further submits that extension is required for issuance of Form 'G' and further process thereafter for successful revival of the Corporate Debtor. It was further submitted that request for Resolution Plan, Information Memorandum and Bid Evaluation matrix has already been approved by the CoC.

4.

We have considered the submissions of the learned counsel and consider it appropriate to allow extension of 90 days beyond a period of 180 days from 19.06.2024, accordingly, the CRP will come to an end of 16.08.2024 now.

5.

As regards prayer for exclusion of time is concerned, the exclusion has been sought on the ground that there is change in the incumbent IRP and no substantial progress was made in the CIRP of Corporate Debtor during the tenure of earlier IRP. This bench is of considered view that the period cannot be excluded on this ground. If the incumbent RP is aggrieved by the inaction of erstwhile IRP, he may take up the matter with the IBBI for appropriate remedial action.

6.

In view thereof, the extension of 90 days from the CIRP period is only allowed.

7.

Hence the IA 3398/2024 is partly allowed and disposed of.

IA 3440/2024

1.

None present for the applicant.

2.

Issue notice to the Resolution Professional to file reply within two weeks.

3.

List this matter for further hearing on 23.07.2024.