Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2024) 02 NCLT CK 3401

Golden Services Through Its Proprietor Balkishan Gome vs AUM Event & Promotions India Pvt. Ltd.

National Company Law Tribunal · Decided on 8 February 2024

HON’BLE JUDGES
Shammi Khan, Member (Judicial) · Sameer Kakar, Member (Technical)
CASE NUMBER
C.P.(IB)/229(AHM)2020

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

43 paragraphs · 1,502 words
1.

The Present Application was filed on 17.03.2020 by Golden Services Through its Proprietor Balkishan Gome (hereinafter referred to as “the Applicant/Operational Creditor”) against AUM Event & Promotions India Pvt. Ltd.(hereinafter referred to as “the Respondent/Corporate Debtor”) under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC, 2016) read with Rule 6 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy (Application to Adjudicating Authority) Rules, 2016 with a prayer to initiate the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (in short “CIRP”) against the Corporate Debtor for having defaulted in payment of its outstanding dues of Rs.8, 26,149/-.

2.

On perusal of Part-I of the Form-V reveals that the Applicant/Operational Creditor is one Golden Service through its Proprietor Balkishan Gome. The registered office of the Applicant/Operational Creditor is situated at 79/2 Nehru Nagar, Indore (M.P.) 452001.

3.

On perusal of Part-II of the Form-V reveals that the Respondent/Corporate Debtor is one AUM Event & Promotions India Private Limited having CIN No. U93000GJ2008PTC054468 incorporated on 14.07.2008. The registered office of the Respondent/ Corporate Debtor is situated at 01-“Arihant”, 83/B, Swastik Society, B/H. St. Xavier’s Ladies Hostel, Nr. Swastik Char Rast, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, 380009.

4.

An affidavit for filing this application is signed by one CS Chetan Narwani, Company Secretary and authorized representative of Applicant having its registered office at S-85, Yeshwant Plaza, Opp. Railway Station Road, Indore (M.P.) 452001 authorized by Authorization letter dated 06.03.2020 which is annexed to the Petition.

5.

On perusal of Part-III of the Form-V reveals that the Applicant/Operational Creditor has not proposed the name of any person to be appointed as Interim Resolution Professional.

6.

On perusal of Part-IV of the Form-V reveals that total dues as claimed by the Applicant/Operational Creditor is Rs.8,26,149/-consisting of Rs.5,65,856/- being principle and amount of Rs.2,60,293/- as interest at the rate of 2% as on 14.11.2019.

7.

The averments made by the Applicant in its application are summarized hereunder:-

a)

It is submitted that during the period from October 2017 to January 2018, the Operational Creditor provided and delivered various types of services (specifically, Housekeeping Services and Pest Control Services) to the Corporate Debtor.

b)

The Corporate Debtor, until 15.02.2018, made payments to the Operational Creditor but subsequently stopped further payments.

c)

The Applicant herewith submitted copies of the Bank statements from IDBI Bank, illustrating payments made by the Respondent. The last payment, amounting to Rs.3,00,000/-and dated 15.02.2018, was received in the Current Account of Golden Services with IDBI Bank.

d)

The total outstanding debt is comprised of the principal amount of Rs.5,65,856/- and an aggregate interest amount of Rs.2,60,293/- at a rate of 2% per month. The total default amount, as indicated in the attached invoice, is Rs.8,26,149/-.

e)

Prior to commencing legal proceedings, the Applicant issued a statutory Demand Notice on 04.11.2019, in the prescribed format of Form 3 under Rule 5 (1) (a) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (Application to Adjudicating Authority) Rules, 2016.

f)

The Respondent in its reply to the demand notice dated 15.11.2019 disregarded any such claim/debt raised by the petitioner.

g)

The Applicant relies upon below mentioned documents to prove its case:-

ParticularsA AnnexuresPage No.
1.Working of Computation of the amount of Unpaid Invoice and dates of defaultA110
2.Ma Copy of Bank statements showing the Respondent’s last payment dated 15.02.2018A211-12
3. ACopy of Email, Demand notice in Form 3&4 along with proof of dispatch and service thereof.A313-39
4.General Affidavit verifying the petitionA440-42
5. WAffidavit Under Section-9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy code, 2016.A543-45
6. RReply sent by the Respondent through itself dated 15.11.2019A646
7. ACopy of pan card and Aadhar card and GST Registration certificate of Applicant.A747-49
8.Authority Letter for AppearanceA850
9.Memorandum of Appearance, VakalatnamaA951
10.Complete Invoices & Copy of mail communication with Corporate Debtor.A1052-59
8.

The Respondent through one Prakash Kundalia Director of the Respondent company has filed its reply through Affidavit on 20.07.2020 having diary Inward No. 5180.It is submitted that no formal written agreement with regard to interest exists between the parties.

9.

The Applicant filed a rejoinder through affidavit on 18.08.2020 having diary inward No.6239 and contended that multiple emails were dispatched to corporate debtor requesting payment and emphasized on email dated 23.10.2023 stating that non-payment of debt will attract interest at a rate of 2% per month for the preceding 10 months.

10.

This Tribunal vide Order dated 05.04.2021, has dismissed this petition i.e. CP(IB) 229 of 2020 for want of prosecution with liberty to revive the same showing sufficient cause for non-appearance.

11.

Further, Mis.App/3(AHM)2021 was filed for restoration, which was allowed and restored CP(IB)229(AHM)2020 vide order dated 15.06.2021 by this Tribunal.

12.

The Applicant has filed written arguments on 08.11.2021 through Diary Inward no. D1667.

13.

In the Interim Order dated 29.03.2023 passed by this Hon’ble Tribunal, it is recorded that the Corporate Debtor has admitted his liability of debt.

14.

The Respondent has filed written submissions on 29.08.2023 through Diary Inward no. D3281 admitting its debt liability and with a view to resolve disputes between the parties, paid the principal amount of Rs.5,65,856/-

15.

Interim order dated 31.08.2023 records as under:

“Learned Proxy Counsel Mr. Deepesh Gome for the applicant submits that, without the consent of the applicant, the respondent has transferred Rs. 5,32,536/- to the account on 28.08.2023, and the interest part has not been paid, which is confirmed by the respondent stating that principal amount due has been cleared only interest is left. Let both the parties sit together and reconcile about the interest part.”

As such it is an admitted position between the two parties that the present matter pertains to interest only.

16.

We have heard the Ld. Counsel for both the parties and perused the material available on record. It is noted that total outstanding debt is comprised of the principle amount of Rs.5,65,856/- and an aggregate interest amount of Rs.2,60,293/- at a rate of 2% per month. The total default amount, as indicated in the attached invoice, is Rs.8,26,149/-.

17.

Since the principle amount had been paid by the Respondent on 28.08.2023, we are not dealing with the objections of the Respondent and rejoinder of the Applicant at this stage and confine ourself to the remaining issue of the interest.

18.

It is noted that the Respondent admitted the liability and paid the principal amount i.e. Rs.5,65,856/- on 28.08.2023 which is also confirmed by the Applicant leaving the Interest remain unpaid. This Tribunal vide its order dated 31.08.2023 directed both the parties to sit together and reconcile about interest. However, no such reconciliation has taken place between the parties. Therefore, the Applicant is pursuing the present application for claiming Interest.

19.

In this regard reliance can be placed upon order by Hon’ble National Company Law Appellate Tribunal in case of ‘S.S. Polymers Vs. Kanodia Technoplast Limited’ in ‘Company Appeal (AT) (Ins) No. 1227 of 2019 decided on 13.11.2019’ in which a similar controversy was involved and the following observations have been made which read thus:-

“3.

The Adjudicating Authority has noticed that a sum of Rs.25,00,000/- out of Rs.32,71,800/- was paid to the Appellant by 31st December, 2018 through RTGS(s). The remaining amount of Rs.7,71,800/- was also paid by ‘Corporate Debtor’ to the Applicant by 17th January, 2019 through NEFT(s). The said amounts were paid before the admission of the application under Section 9 of the I&B Code. Even after receiving the total amount due, the Appellant pursued the application under Section 9 of the I&B Code for a sum of Rs.2,16,155/- towards interest. In these background, the Adjudicating Authority observed that in the absence of any Agreement, no such amount can be claimed. 4. The Learned Counsel for the Appellant relied on ‘Invoices’ to suggest that in the ‘Invoices’, the claim was raised for payment of interest. However, we are not inclined to accept such submission as they were one side Invoices raised without any consent of the ‘Corporate Debtor’. 5. Admittedly, before the admission of an application under Section 9 of the I&B Code, the ‘Corporate Debtor’ paid the total debt. The application was pursued for realisation of the interest amount, which, according to us is against the principle of the I&B Code, as it should be treated to be an application pursued by the Applicant with malicious intent (to realise only Interest) for any purpose other than for the Resolution of Insolvency, or Liquidation of the ‘Corporate Debtor’ and which is barred in view of Section 65 of the I&B Code. 6. We find no merit in this Appeal and it is accordingly dismissed.”

20.

Admittedly, before the admission of an application under Section 9 of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy (I&B) Code, the 'Corporate Debtor' paid the principal amount; the applicant is pursuing present application for the interest amount, apparently there is no interest clause in the agreement produced before us and the applicant is relying on the invoices.

21.

The present case is covered under the judgment of Hon’ble NCLAT in S.S. Polymers (supra).

22.

Accordingly, in light of the above facts and above referred judgment the present petition CP(IB)/229/AHM/2020 is dismissed.