Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2023) 01 NCLAT CK 0016

Gold Plaza Developers Pvt. Ltd vs Infra Care India

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal · Decided on 5 January 2023

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ashok Bhushan, Chairperson · Barun Mitra, Member (T)
RESULT
Disposed of
CASE NUMBER
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 1314 Of 2022

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

13 paragraphs · 370 words
1.

This Appeal has been filed against order dated 14.10.2022 by which Adjudicating Authority has admitted Section 9 application which was filed by the Operational Creditor for payment of Rs.27,90,969/-. When the Appeal was taken by this Tribunal on 03.11.2022, following order was passed:

“ORDER

03.11.2022: Learned Counsel for the Appellant submits that the Appellant is ready to deposit the total amount of Rs. 27,90,969/- within two weeks.

2.

Learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent submits that the Appellant did not respond even after notice.

3.

Be that as it may, let Appellant deposit the said amount within two weeks from today by way of Bank Draft in the name of Respondent and the Bank Draft be handed over to the Respondent.

4.

List the Appeal on 28.11.2022.

In the meantime, in pursuance of the order dated 14.10.2022, no further steps shall be taken.”

2.

On 28.11.2022, counsel for the Appellant submitted that Demand Draft of Rs. 27,90,969/- has been handed over to the Respondent. Matter was adjourned on the request of the Appellant to negotiate with the Respondent regarding the amount of interest.

3.

When  the  Appeal  has  been  taken  today,  learned  counsel  for  the Appellant as well as learned counsel for the Respondent submitted that they have already settled regarding the amount of interest, hence the matter be closed.

4.

Learned counsel for the IRP submits that the IRP has incurred some expenses and he is also entitled for fees.

5.

Learned  counsel  for  the  Operational  Creditor  submits  that  in pursuance of the order of the Adjudicating Authority, an amount of Rs.3 Lakhs has already been paid to the IRP.

6.

After the proceedings were initiated under Section 9 interim order was passed within three weeks. The expenses incurred must be on publication. We having directed on 03.11.2022 that no further steps shall be taken in pursuance of the impugned order dated 14.10.2022, we are satisfied that amount of Rs.3 Lakhs already paid to the IRP shall suffice towards his fee and expenses.

7.

In view of the above, we see that no purpose shall be served in permitting the Section 9 proceedings before the Adjudicating Authority. Appeal is disposed of with observations as above. CIRP stands closed.