High CourtsSingle Bench(2026) 08 OHC CK 1581

Golak @ Golakha Sahu & Ors. vs State of Odisha

Orissa High Court, Cuttack Bench · Decided on 19 August 2026

HON’BLE JUDGES
G. Satapathy, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
BLAPL Nos.6411, 3877 & 7673 of 2026

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 510 words

G. Satapathy, J.

1.

These are bail applications U/S.483 of BNSS by the petitioners for grant of bail in connection with Kodala P.S. Case No. 138 of 2026 corresponding to Special G.R. Case No. 07 of 2026(N) pending in the file of learned Addl. Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, Khallikote, Ganjam, for commission of offence punishable U/S.20(b)(ii)(C) of the NDPS Act, on the main allegation of transporting 22Kgs 200Grams of Contraband Ganja on a motor cycle bearing Regd. No.OD-07BA-2874.

2.

Heard Mr. Sarat Kumar Jena, learned counsel for the petitioners in BLAPL Nos. 6411 & 7673 of 2026, Mr. Bijaya Kumar Behera, learned counsel for the petitioner in BLAPL No. 3877 of 2026 and Mr. T.K. Acharya, learned Addl. PP in these matters and perused the record. On being queried about the criminal antecedents of the petitioners, Mr. Jena and Mr. Behera jointly volunteer to withhold bail to the petitioners, if they are found to have any criminal antecedent of similar nature for commission of offence under NDPS Act.

3.

Admittedly, the petitioners were taken into custody on 20.03.2026, but in the meantime, charge-sheet has already been submitted, however, the trial is yet to commence and there are 24 charge sheeted witnesses and, therefore, the trial would definitely take some time. It is, however, claimed that the petitioners are not having any criminal antecedents of similar nature. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances and on going through the materials placed on record together with the claim of the petitioners for not having any criminal antecedents, the petitioners would be considered to have satisfied the conditions of Section 37 of NDPS Act, if they are not having any criminal antecedent for commission of offences under NDPS Act.

4.

For the reasons stated hereinabove and taking into account the custodial period of the petitioners, this Court without expressing any view on merit, admits each of the petitioners to bail, but subject to verification of their criminal antecedents for similar nature for commission of offence under NDPS Act.

5.

Hence, these three bail applications of the petitioners namely Golak @ Golakha Sahu (BLAPL No. 6411 of 2026); Achyuta Dakua (BLAPL No. 3877 of 2026) and Deepak Barik (BLAPL No. 7673 of 2026) stand allowed and each of the petitioners is allowed to go on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh) each with two solvent sureties for the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Court in seisin of the case on such terms and conditions as deem fit and proper by it.

In view of the specific submission advanced for the petitioners, the benefit of the aforesaid order shall not be extended to the concerned petitioner(s), if he/they is/are found to have criminal antecedent(s) of similar nature for commission of offence under NDPS Act.

6.

Accordingly, these BLAPLs stand disposed of. Issue urgent certified copy of the order as per Rules. A soft copy of this order be immediately communicated to the concerned Court, who shall afterwards communicate the same to the concerned Jail through e-mail for reference.