High CourtsDivision Bench(1943) 02 MAD CK 0018

Gogula Venkanna and Others vs The Panchayat Board, Munagapaka and Another

Madras High Court · Decided on 22 February 1943 · Citation: AIR 1943 Mad 508 : (1943) 1 MLJ 399

HON’BLE JUDGES
Somayya, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

16 paragraphs · 357 words

Somayya, J.—These cases seem to be directly covered by the express wording of Section 45-B of the Local Boards Act. This section

enacts that if a panchayat is superseded, the Provincial Government shall be subject to all the liabilities of the panchayat as on the date of the

dissolution or supersession, and it also says that if the panchayat is later on reconstituted, until the date of reconstitution, the Provincial Government

will be liable and after that date the reconstituted board will, be liable for all the liabilities of the superseded panchayat. The liability in question in

each of these two appeals arose under a decree of Court which the appellants had obtained against the superseded or dissolved panchayat. The

lower Courts have, on what they considered to be the intention of the Legislature, refused to apply the plain provisions of the section and have

restricted the provisions of Section 45-b to a case where there are assets of the panchayat in the hands of the Provincial Government. It is said that

otherwise the general tax-payer will suffer great loss and that it could not be the intention of the Legislature to take upon itself the liability of paying

all the debts of the superseded board. All this is, in my opinion, wholly irrelevant when the wording of the section is clear. Section 45-B lays down

expressly that the Provincial Government shall be subject to all the liabilities of the superseded panchayat and this is not made subject to the

possession of any assets of the superseded panchayat. If, as stated by the learned Government Pleader on behalf of the respondents, a new

panchayat has been reconstituted for that village, then u/s 45-8 further execution will proceed against the reconstituted panchayat. But until the date

of reconstitution the Provincial Government will be liable.

2.

The orders of the lower Courts are reversed and the execution petitions will be taken on file by the first Court and further execution will proceed

according to law. The respondents will pay the costs of the appellants in all the Courts. Time for payment three months.

3.

Leave to appeal is refused.