High CourtsSingle Bench(1992) 01 P&H CK 0028

Godfrey Phillips India Limited vs Shri Chander Prakash Chaudhary and Others

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 15 January 1992 · Citation: (1992) 101 PLR 446

HON’BLE JUDGES
V.K. Jhanji, J
CASE NUMBER
Civil Revision No. 5076 of 1991

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 189 words

V.K. Jhanji, J.—Respondents filed a suit for permanent injunction. Along with the said suit, an application for ad interim injunction was also filed by the respondents.

2.

On the application for grant of ad-interim injunction, the trial Court passed an ex-parte order of injunction in favour of the plaintiffs respondents. This order was challenged by the defendants (petitioners herein) is an appeal before the learned District Judge, Gurgaon, The District Judge, Gurgaon entertained the appeal on 27.12.1991, but passed no order on the application of the petitioners for staying the operation of order of the trial Court. This order has been impugned by the petitioners in the present revision petition.

3.

After hearing learned counsel for the parties, I am of the view that the appeal filed by the petitioners before the District Judge, Gurgaon, is to be decided first, and I direct accordingly. The learned District Judge, Gurgaon, shall decide the appeal within a period of four weeks from today. During the pendency of the said appeal, operation of order or the trial Court shall remain stayed.

4.

With the aforesaid direction, the revision petition is disposed of.