High CourtsDivision Bench(1997) 10 BOM CK 0035

Goa Electricals and Fans Ltd. vs Acce, Panaji and Others

Bombay High Court · Decided on 16 October 1997 · Citation: (1998) 98 ELT 85

HON’BLE JUDGES
R.M.S. Khandeparkar, J · R.K. Batta, J
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition No. 334/97, decided on October 16, 1997

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 292 words

Shri R.K. Batta, J.—Heard. Rule.

2.

In these petitions the impugned Orders were passed on 28th November, 1996 and 14th October, 1996, respectively, and the petitioners had filed appeals along with applications u/s 35F of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, for waiving/dispensation of deposition. In the meantime, respondent No. 1 had issued notice for recovery. The applications u/s 35F of the said Act were not disposed of but the appeals were heard by the Commissioner of Central Excise, (Appeals) Mumbai on 22nd April, 1997, but till today no judgment has been passed disposing of the said appeals. On 12th September, 1997, the goods belonging to the petitioner were attached under Detention Order dated 19th August, 1997.

3.

We had made enquiries with the learned Additional Central Government Standing Counsel as to whether the applications u/s 35A under the said Act can be disposed of within a reasonable period of two to three weeks after hearing the petitioners, since the goods of the petitioners had been attached even in spite of the fact that the appeals had been heard on merits on 22nd April, 1997. Today, the Central Government Standing Counsel has placed before us a communication received from the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals) Mumbai, that it is not possible to hear the petitioners within three weeks on the applications u/s 35F of the said Act, but the matter will be heard and finally decided within three months. Under these circumstances, we are left with no alternative but to order the release of the goods of the petitioners which were attached under Detention Order dated 19th August, 1997. The respondent No. 1 is therefore, directed to release the said goods immediately on the receipt of a copy of this order.