AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
Judgment
Mohit S. Shah, C.J.—These Tax Appeals u/s 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 raises the same question which was raised in Tax Appeal No. 13 of 2005 and other connected Tax Appeals, which came to be decided by the Division Bench of this Court, to which one of us 2 was a party (F.M. Reis, J.), by judgment dated 21/10/2010. There is no dispute about the fact that the same questions of law are raised in the present appeals also.
Following the aforesaid decision dated 21/10/2010 in Tax Appeal No. 13 of 2005 and other connected Tax Appeals, we allow these appeals and hold that the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was not right in holding that the calcined petroleum coke manufactured by the Appellant was a "mineral oil" within the meaning of Section 80HHC(2)(b) of the Act. The question of law accordingly is answered in favour of the Assessee and against the Revenue. The decision of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal confirming the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax as also the judgment and order of the Commissioner of Income Tax dated 13/08/2007 u/s 263(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 are quashed and set aside.
Both the appeals accordingly stand disposed of.
