High Courts(1894) 02 MAD CK 0008

Gnanambal vs Ammalu Ammal

Madras High Court · Decided on 15 February 1894 · Citation: (1895) 5 MLJ 94

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 161 words
1.

We see no reason to doubt the correctness of the Judge''s finding that A is in the handwriting of the deceased Sadasiva Sastri. It is contended

for the appellant that, even if A is genuine, it was intended only to operate in case of the death of the testator within the year, as is apparent from

the words ''Melpadi Varushathukkullaaga'' (for the above year) contained in it.

2.

We are of opinion that these words cannot have been used without some object and the only object with which they can be held to have been

used is to limit the operation in the manner urged on behalf of the appellant.

3.

Such being the case, the deceased must be held to have died intestate and petitioner''s application for Letters of Administration with copy of the

Will annexed must be dismissed.

4.

We allow this appeal and, setting aside the Lower Court''s order dismiss the application for administration with costs throughout.