High CourtsSingle Bench(2020) 07 J&K CK 0059

Ghulam Rasool Bhat vs Abdul Gani Mir And Others

Jammu And Kashmir High Court · Decided on 15 July 2020

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sindhu Sharma, J
RESULT
Disposed Off
CASE NUMBER
Civil Miscellaneous No. 48, 2441, 2442 Of 2020, Caveat No. 721 Of 2020

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

14 paragraphs · 402 words

Sindhu Sharma, J

Caveat No. 721/2020

With the appearance of Mr. Shuja Ul Haq, learned counsel for the respondents, who is on caveat, caveat stand discharged.

CM No. 2441/2020

Applicant seeks extension of time for annexing the requisite court fee with the writ petition.

For the reasons stated in the application, same is allowed. Applicant is directed to deposit the requisite court fee with the Registry of this Court within a period of one week after lifting the restrictions imposed in the High Court on account of COVID-19 pandemic.

Application is disposed of.

CM(M) No. 48/2020 & CM No. 2442/2020

This petition under Article-227 of the Constitution of India has been preferred by the petitioner challenging order dated 19.03.2020 passed in an appeal by the Principal District Judge, Shopian, vide which, operation of status quo order dated 12.03.2020 passed by Munsiff, Shopian was stayed.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner's suit for permanent prohibitory injunction for restraining the respondents from causing any interference in the suit property was pending adjudication before the court of learned Munsiff, Shopian and vide order dated 12.03.2018, the parties were directed to maintain status quo with regard to the suit land measuring 07 Kanals 15 Marlas under Survey No. 75 situated at Mastpora Shopian, Tehsil Keller, District Shopian, till next date of hearing fixed in the suit.

The defendants/respondents herein filed their written statement but subsequently, they moved an application for amendment of the said written statement which was pending adjudication. When they filed an appeal after almost two years against ad interim order of status quo dated 12.03.2018, the Appellate Court has stayed the same.

Learned counsel for the parties in all fairness have agreed and consented that the impugned order of the Principal District Judge, Shopian, be set aside and the Court below be directed to pass an order afresh after hearing both the parties.

This petition is disposed of with the consent of the parties and impugned order dated 19.03.2020 passed by the Principal District Judge, Shopian, is set aside. Parties through their counsel are directed to appear before the Court of Principal District Judge, Shopian on 25.08.2020, who shall after hearing both the parties pass an order afresh and till such time the order is passed, the parties shall maintain status quo and no construction shall be raised on the land in dispute.

Disposed of alongwith all the connected applications.