Supreme CourtDivision Bench(2012) 04 SC CK 0008

Ghisalal M. Agrawal (D) Thr. L.Rs. and Others vs Rameshwar @ Ramu Jawaharlal and Another

Supreme Court Of India · Decided on 16 April 2012 · Citation: (2012) 5 SCC 758

HON’BLE JUDGES
H.L. Dattu, J · Chandramauli Kumar Prasad, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Civil Appeal No. 3575 of 2012 (Arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) No. 5990 of 2009)

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 213 words
1.

Leave granted.

2.

Heard Learned Counsel for the parties to the lis.

3.

After hearing Learned Counsel for the parties to the lis and after carefully going through the impugned judgment, we are of the opinion that the High Court in Second Appeal was not justified in reversing the concurrent findings arrived at by the Trial Court and the first Appellate Court. Accordingly, we set aside the orders passed by the High Court and restore the orders passed by the Trial Court.

4.

Since the Respondents are holding back the premises in question from the last five decades, we are of the opinion that they will quit and deliver the vacant possession of the premises to the landlord. Accordingly, we direct the Respondents to deliver the vacant possession of the premises to the Appellant(s) within a year's time from today. If, for any reason, the Respondents fails to comply with the orders and directions issued by this Court, the Appellant(s) is/are at liberty to take effective steps for evicting the premises. If necessity arises, the Appellant(s) can also take the assistance of the police.

5.

Learned Counsel for the Respondents will file the usual undertaking before this Court within four weeks' from today.

6.

The appeal is disposed of accordingly. No costs.