High CourtsSingle Bench(2009) 12 DEL CK 0202

Gemalto Terminals India Pvt. Ltd. and Others vs Pine Labs Pvt. Ltd.

Delhi High Court · Decided on 8 December 2009

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manmohan Singh, J
CASE NUMBER
I.A. No. 14247 of 2009 and I.A. No. 14946 of 2009 in CS (OS) No. 2091 of 2009

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 304 words

Manmohan Singh, J.

I.A. No. 14247/2009

1.

The present suit has been filed by Gemalto Terminals India Pvt. Ltd. who is defendant No. 1 in suit No. 1876/2009. The interim application No. 14247/2009 filed by the plaintiff in the present suit under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 has been heard along with the applications being I.A. No. 12825/2009, I.A. No. 13130/2009 and I.A. No. 14570/2009 in suit No. 1876/2009. The order passed in those applications may be read as order in the present application. The present application is, therefore, disposed of in view of the order passed in these applications.

IA No. 14247/2009 disposed of accordingly.

I.A. No. 14946/2009

2.

The present application has been filed by defendant u/s 10 read with Section 151 of the CPC for stay of the suit being a subsequent suit on the same subject matter. It is an undisputed fact that the subject matter in both the suits is the same. The MAIN distinction in both matters is that both the parties are claiming their ownership in the softwares, on the basis of various rival pleas raised by them in their cases.

3.

Since both the parties have filed counter suits against each other and each party is claiming copyright in the softwares, therefore the prayer made in the application for stay of the suit proceedings in the present case cannot be granted. In the interest of the parties and to save cost and time and in order to avoid conflicting orders, I am of the view that the present suit be consolidated with the earlier suit CS (OS) No. 1876/2009 and the trial be recorded in suit No. 1876/2009.

4.

For the reasons given above, no further orders are required to be passed. I.A. No. 14946/2009 is disposed of.