High CourtsSingle Bench(2010) 11 KL CK 0234

Geetha and Aji vs Thulaseedharan Pillai and State of Kerala

High Court Of Kerala · Decided on 24 November 2010

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sasidharan Nambiar, J
CASE NUMBER
Criminal MC. No. 4090 of 2010

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 276 words

M. Sasidharan Nambiar, J.—Petitioners are the accused in C.C. No. 132/2008 on the file of Chief Judicial Magistrate''s Court, Pathanamthitta, taken cognizance for the offences under Sections 408, 420, 468 and 477A read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code on Annexure-A2 final report. This petition is filed u/s 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure to quash the proceedings contending that entire disputes with the first Respondent were settled amicably.

2.

First Respondent appeared through a counsel and filed an affidavit stating that he has settled all the disputes with the Petitioners and therefore, he has no objection for quashing the proceedings.

3.

Learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioners, first Respondent and learned Public Prosecutor were heard.

4.

Prosecution case is that Petitioners were the staff of Srilakshmi Financiers run by the first Respondent and with the intention to cheat the financiers, Petitioners misappropriated amounts due to 82 witnesses mentioned in the final report and forged receipts and thereby committed the offences.

5.

Offences are not purely personal in nature against the first Respondent. Though first Respondent sustained loss, the affected parties are the witnesses mentioned in the charge sheet. In such circumstances, the case cannot be quashed based on the settlement arrived at with the first Respondent alone. If Petitioners settle the disputes with all the witnesses mentioned in the final report, they are at liberty to approach this Court again and this order will not be a bar. Petitioners are also entitled to raise all the contentions raised herein before the learned Magistrate and seek an order of discharge u/s 239 of Code of Criminal Procedure if charge is not framed.

Petition is disposed.