Tribunals and Commissions(2002) 02 NCDRC CK 0041

G.D.A. vs Gurmeet Kaur

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission · Decided on 15 February 2002 · Citation: 2002 3 CPJ 192

HON’BLE JUDGES
D.P.Wadhwa , Rajyalakshmi Rao , B.K.Taimni J.
RESULT
Revision Petition dismissed

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 178 words
1.

THIS revision petition has been filed by petitioner, GDA against the order of State Commission dismissing the appeal filed by them against the order of the District Forum allowing the complaint filed by the respondent/complainant.

2.

THE learned Counsel for the GDA argues that they are aggrieved by the rate of interest and the period for which interest has been granted. In HUDA & Others v. Darsh Kumar, Revision Petition No. 1197 of 1998, we have already agreed with grant of interest @ 18%. In the present case we find that it is as per our own order referred to above. Even though money was deposited in 1989, rate of interest ordered to be paid is from 1.1.1994, covering the two years period after the deposit of amount, and the period covered by stay granted by the Allahabad High Court and rate of interest awarded to the respondent is 18%. We find no ground to interefere with the orders passed by both the lower Forum revision petition is dismissed. No orders as to costs. Revision Petition dismissed.