High CourtsDivision Bench(1894) 12 CAL CK 0004

G.B. McIntosh, Administrator to the Estate of Mr. A.R. McIntosh vs Jharu Molla

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 18 December 1894 · Citation: (1895) ILR (Cal) 454

HON’BLE JUDGES
Trevelyan, J · O''Kinealy, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 93 words

O''Kinealy and Trevelyan, JJ.—The question raised in this second appeal is, whether a person, who is an administrator, and as such the representative of the deceased and the legal owner of his property, is bound to be registered under a. 42 of the Land Registration Act. Looking at the nature of the Act, and the purposes for which it was enacted, namely, to prevent people from realizing rent without being registered, we think that an administrator is bound to be registered u/s 42, and that this appeal must, therefore, be dismissed with costs.