High CourtsDivision Bench(2020) 10 DEL CK 0132

Gaursons Realtech Pvt Ltd vs Union Of India & Ors

Delhi High Court · Decided on 20 October 2020

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manmohan, J · Sanjeev Narula, J
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Petition No. 5347 Of 2020

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

12 paragraphs · 398 words

Manmohan, J

C.M.No. 26700/2020

1.

The application has been listed before this Bench by t he Registry in view of the urgency expressed therein. The same has been heard by way of video conferencing.

2.

Present application has been filed by the petitioner seeking a st ay on the operation of direction under Rule 133(4) of the CGST Ru les given in the impugned order dated 07th July, 2020 to the respondent no.3 to undertake further investigation and the notice dated 09th Oct ober, 2020 as well as summons dated 25th September, 2020 both issued by the respondent no. 3.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner states t hat t his Court st ayed t he penalty proceedings as well as investigation with regard to other projects of the petitioner vide order dated 5th October, 2020.

4.

He further states that respondent no.3 vide notice dated 09th October, 2020 directed the applicant to answer the summons dated 25th Sept ember, 2020 and provide the information/ documents in respect of its project '16th Park View' as there was no stay of direction passed under Ru le 133(4) of the CGST Rules, 2017 vide Order dated 05th October, 2020.

5.

He emphasises that in spite of grant of stay of further investigation by this Court, respondent no.3 has precipitated the issue. In view of the aforesaid, he states that if the summons dated 25th Sept ember, 2020 an d notice dated 09th October, 2020 are not stayed by this Court, the respondent nos. 2 and 3 will take coercive steps against the applicant.

6.

He lastly reiterates that the entire benefit of input tax credit as well as reduction in rate of tax has been passed on to the flat buyers.

7.

Issue notice.

8.

Mr.Bhagwan Swarup, CGSC accepts notice on behalf of respon dent no.1 and Mr.Ravi Prakash, Advocate accepts notice on behalf of the respondent nos.2 & 3/non-applicants.

9.

Keeping in view the aforesaid, the direction under Rule 133(4) of the CGST Rules given in the impugned order dated 07th July, 2020 to the respondent no.3 to undertake further investigation and the notice dated 09th October, 2020 as well as summons dated 25th September, 2020 are stayed till further orders. Accordingly, the application stands disposed of.

10.

The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. Copy of the order be also forwarded to the learned counsel through e-mail.