High CourtsSingle Bench(2021) 08 UK CK 0069

Gaurav Bhakuni vs State Of Uttarakhand & Others

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 5 August 2021

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (S/S) No. 2089 Of 2019

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

13 paragraphs · 211 words

Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J

1.

Petitioner was appointed as Assistant Teacher â€" L.T. Grade (Mathematics) on 31.07.2006. He was subsequently promoted as Lecturer (Physics)

vide order dated 10.06.2016.

2.

In this writ petition, petitioner has claimed notional promotion to the post of Lecturer from 18.10.2011 on the ground that the post of Lecturer

(Physics) fell vacant on 18.10.2011 and as he fulfilled all conditions of eligibility, therefore, he ought to have been considered for promotion against the

said vacancy.

3.

Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the claim raised by the petitioner, this Court thinks that ends of justice would be met, if petitioner is

permitted to make representation to the Competent Authority, who shall look into the matter.

4.

Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to make representation to the Manager, CRST Inter College, Nainital within

three weeks from today. If such a representation is made within stipulated time, Manager shall consider petitioner’s prayer and take appropriate

decision, in accordance with law, preferably within four months from the date of production of such representation along with certified copy of this

order.

5.

It goes without saying that before passing any order, the Manager shall take concurrence from the Chief Education Officer, Nainital.