High CourtsSingle Bench(2018) 02 CHH CK 0312

Gaukaran Lal Sahu vs Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax And Ors

Chhattisgarh High Court · Decided on 19 February 2018

HON’BLE JUDGES
P. Sam Koshy, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
WPT No. 34 Of 2018

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

20 paragraphs · 344 words

P. Sam Koshy, J

1.

The challenge in the present Writ Petition is to Annexure-P/1 dated 10/11/2017 which is a demand notice raised by the Income Tax Department

under Section 156 of the Income Tax Act.

2.

The contention of the counsel for the petitioner is that, against the order of assessment dated 29/12/2017, the petitioner has already preferred an

appeal which is pending consideration before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) - 1, Raipur. He submits that, the appeal is still pending

consideration and the respondents meanwhile have issued the demand notice and if the demand notice is acted upon or executed, the appeal would get

frustrated.

3.

The counsel appearing for either side submits that, the issue involved in the present case stands squarely covered by the decision of this Court in

WPT No. 66/2017 (Sanjay Kumar Kochhar V. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr., decided on 13/07/2017) wherein this Court had

directed the petitioner therein to move an appropriate application before the assessing authority seeking for stay of execution of the assessment order

and in the event if, the assessing officer rejects the same, the liberty would be with the petitioner to prefer an appeal before the Principle

Commissioner of Income Tax challenging the order of the assessing officer under Section 220(6) of the Income Tax Act.

4.

In the light of the submissions made by the counsel appearing for either side, the present Writ Petition also deserves to be and is accordingly

disposed off in similar terms.

5.

The petitioner is directed to move an appropriate application before the assessing officer seeking for stay of the demand notice and in the event if

the assessing officer rejects the same, the petitioner would be at liberty to initiate further proceedings as is evolved under instruction No.1914 dated

21/03/1996 which further stands modified vide office memorandum dated 31/07/2017.

6.

Needless to mention that, since the appeal is pending consideration, it is expected that the authorities concerned shall decide the appeal as

expeditiously as possible.

7.

The Writ Petition stands disposed off.