High Courts(1903) 02 CAL CK 0006

Ganga Prosad vs Raj Coomar Singh

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 23 February 1903

RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Appeal from order No. 290 of 1902

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 228 words

Ghose and Pratt, JJ.—The application which the judgment-debtor made to the Munsif, upon which his order of the 14th April 1902 was made, related to a matter contemplated by Section 287, Clause (e), Code of Civil Procedure, namely, the value of the property to be specified in the sale proclamation, the judgment-debtor asserting that the amount as mentioned in that paper was grossly inadequate. The Munsif did not go into any evidence on this matter upon the ground that, in his view, the sale might be hereafter set aside if the property be sold at an inadequate price, the result being that the sale proclamation, as it was originally issued, was maintained.

2.

Against this order of the Munsif, the judgment-debtor appealed to the higher Court; and the Subordinate Judge has dismissed the appeal upon the simple ground that no appeal lay against the order of the Munsif.

3.

We think that in this respect the Court below was in error, because the order made by the Munsif was an order between the parties as falling u/s 244, Code of Civil Procedure; and if so, it is obvious that an appeal did lie to the higher Court. We accordingly set aside the order of the Subordinate Judge and send back the record to him for retrial of the appeal preferred to him. The costs will abide the result.