High CourtsDivision Bench(1910) 04 MAD CK 0054

Gandrapu Sinayya vs Koppineni Venkataratnam and Others

Madras High Court · Decided on 1 April 1910 · Citation: 6 Ind. Cas. 701

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ralph Benson, J · Krishnasami Aiyar, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 103 words
1.

The commencement of Abbanna''s tenancy is found and also payment of rent for a number of years by him and successors. The District Judge has not found occupancy right. The tenancy must be presumed to be one from year to year. The plaintiff alleges due notice to quit. Far from denying it in the written statement, the defendant admits notice. In Venkatacharlu v. Kondappa 15 MA. 95, notice to quit was not found. The plaintiff is entitled to eject. We reverse the decree of the District Judge and restore that of the Munsif with costs here and in the lower appellate Court.