Tribunals and CommissionsSingle Bench(2024) 02 DRAT CK 0009

G S Ramesh vs City Union Bank Limited

Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal · Decided on 8 February 2024

HON’BLE JUDGES
S. Ravi Kumar, Chairperson
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
A.IR (SA):1803 Of 2023

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 175 words

S. Ravi Kumar, Chairperson

1.

Advocate for Petitioner/Appellant filed a Memo seeking permission to withdraw the Appeal and made a request for refund of Court Fee. When Advocate for Petitioner/Appellant was requested to show the provision under which Petitioner/Appellant is entitled for refund of Court Fee, he referred to Section 21 of Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987, but that provision cannot be applied here. Said provision is applicable to cases settled in Lok Adalat. Either in RDB Act, 1993 or in SARFAESI Act, 2002, there is no provision for refund of Court Fee.

2.

Admittedly, this case is not settled before Lok Atalat, on the other hand, Petitioner/Appellant, on his own, withdrawn the Appeal and filed a Memo stating that matter is settled with Bank and nothing survives to be prosecuted.

3.

For the above reasons, request for withdrawal of Appeal is accepted, but request of refund of Court Fee is refused.

4.

Accordingly, Appeal A.IR:1803/2023 is dismissed as withdrawn. As Petitioner/Appellant has withdrawn the main Appeal, other Applications, if any, are dismissed as infructous.