Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2019) 05 NCLT CK 3043

G. Raveendran (Rajalakshmi Paper Mills Pvt Ltd) vs Ivax Paper Chemicals Ltd & Anr.

National Company Law Tribunal · Decided on 31 May 2019

HON’BLE JUDGES
B.S.V. Prakash Kumar, Member (Judicial) · S. Vijayaraghavan, Member (Technical)
CASE NUMBER
MA/492/2019 in IBA/239/2019

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 369 words

On MA/492/2019 filed by the Corporate Debtor basing on the Memo of Compromise arrived at between the parties for withdrawal of main Company Petition after the Company Petition was admitted on 28.05.2019, the Applicant counsel has referred to Para No.52 of the order passed by the Honourable Supreme Court of India in W.P.(Civil) No.99 of 2018, which is as follows:

"It is clear that once the Code gets triggered by admission of a creditor's petition under Sections 7 to 9, the proceeding that is before the Adjudicating Authority, being a collective proceeding, is a proceeding in rem. Being a proceeding in rem, it is necessary that the body which is to oversee the resolution process must be consulted before any individual corporate debtor is allowed to settle its claim. A question arises as to what is to happen before a committee of creditors is constituted (as per the timelines that are specified, a committee of creditors can be appointed at any time within 30 days from the date of appointment of the interim resolution professional). We make it clear that at any stage where the committee of creditors is not yet constituted, a party can approach the NCLT directly, which Tribunal may, in exercise of its inherent powers under Rule 11 of the NCLT Rules, 2016, allow or disallow an application for withdrawal or settlement. This will be decided after hearing all the concerned parties and considering all relevant factors on the facts of each case".

Apart from referring the above said para, the Corporate Debtor counsel has also stated that no over dues pending payable to any other Creditor except to the Creditor which filed CP/603/IB/2018 pending, wherein also this Corporate Debtor has already paid the full principal amount and as to interest portion is concerned, the settlement is in progress.

In the backdrop of the factualities, this Bench, looking at the efforts the Corporate Debtor making in paying its over dues, is of the view that this case is fit for withdrawal as envisaged in Para No.52 of the order passed by the Honourable Supreme Court of India in W.P.(Civil) No.99 of 2018.

Accordingly, this Company Petition is hereby dismissed as withdrawn by allowing this miscellaneous application.