High CourtsSingle Bench(2010) 09 MAD CK 0169

G. Rajalakshmi and S. Revathy vs The Tahsildar

Madras High Court · Decided on 22 September 2010

HON’BLE JUDGES
M. Jaichandren, J
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition No. 12018 of 2010

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 255 words

M. Jaichandren, J.—Heard Mr. G. Prabhu Rajadurai, the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioners, as well as Mr. R. Manoharan, the learned Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the Respondent.

2.

Though the prayer sought for by the Petitioners in the present writ petition is for a larger relief, the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner had submitted that it would suffice, if the representation of the Petitioner, dated 28.06.2010, is directed to be disposed of, on merits, within a specified period.

3.

The learned Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the Respondent, has no objection for such an order being passed by this Court.

4.

In view of the averments made in the affidavit filed in support of this petition and in view of the submissions made by the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioners, the Respondent is directed to consider and dispose of the Petitioners'' representation, dated 28.06.2010, on merits and in accordance with law, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the Petitioners, as well as to the other parties concerned, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The Petitioners are directed to submit a copy of the representation, dated 28.06.2010, along with a copy of this order, to the Respondent. However, it is made clear, that this Court, by this order, has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter.

5.

The writ petition stands disposed of, with the above directions. No costs.