High CourtsSingle Bench(2024) 09 DEL CK 2020

Fujifilm India Pvt. Ltd. vs Macart Equipment Pvt. Ltd.

Delhi High Court · Decided on 23 September 2024

HON’BLE JUDGES
C. Hari Shankar, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
O.M.P.(MISC.) (COMM.) 714/2024

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 137 words
1.

This is a petition under Section 29A (4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 19961, for extension of the mandate of the learned Arbitrator, who was in seisin of the dispute between the parties.

2.

The mandate of the learned Arbitrator is stated to have expired on 15 September 2024.

3.

Learned Counsel for the respondent has no objection.

4.

Accordingly, the mandate of the learned Arbitrator stands extended by one year from today.

5.

The petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

6.

Learned counsel for the respondent submits that he intends to move an application before the learned Arbitrator for recall of the claimant’s witnesses. He is permitted to do so. If and when such an application is moved, the learned Arbitrator would consider it on its own merits.

Footnotes

  1. 1.“the 1996 Act”, hereinafter