High CourtsDivision Bench(2006) 03 MAD CK 0065

First Garments Manufacturing Company (India) Private Ltd. vs Bharat Tex Fashions Ltd.

Madras High Court · Decided on 24 March 2006

HON’BLE JUDGES
P. Sathasivam, J · J.A.K. Sampathkumar, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
O.S.A. No. 174 of 2002

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

18 paragraphs · 333 words
1.

The above appeal has been filed against the order of the learned single Judge, dated 18th February, 2002, made in Company Application

No.486 of 2001 in Company Petition No.145 of 1999.

2.

The appellant has filed a Memo dated 17.03.2006 with the following clauses:-

1.

Subsequent to the filing of the above OSA, the Official Liquidator on 12th October 2005 has passed orders accepting the Appellant''s status as

a secured creditor of the company in liquidation. A copy of the order of the Official Liquidator is filed herewith.

2.

Consequent on the orders of the Official Liquidator accepting the Appellant as a secured creditor of the company in liquidation, the Company

Court passed orders on 28th February 2006 directing the secured properties to be sold in association the Official Liquidator. A copy of the orders

of the Company Court is filed herewith.

3.

The Official Liquidator and the Appellant are presently taking steps in compliance with the orders of the Company Court to value the secured

properties and eventually bring the secured properties for sale.

4.

The Appellant is filing this memo to humbly bring the subsequent events to the notice of this Hon''ble Court. The appellant respectfully prays that

this Hon''ble Court may be pleased to take the subsequent events on record.

5.

In the light of the subsequent events, it is respectfully submitted that the Appellant has substantially obtained all the reliefs prayed in the OSA and

no further orders may be required in the OSA. It is respectfully submitted the OSA may therefore be treated as closed.

3.

It is fairly stated by the learned counsel for the appellant as well as the respondent/Official Liquidator that, as on date, nothing survives for

adjudication. Counsel appearing on either side request this Court that the Memo referred above may be recorded. Accordingly, the said Memo

dated 17.3.2006 is hereby recorded. In the light of the same, no further adjudication is required in this Appeal. Appeal is dismissed as infructuous.

No costs.