Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2026) 05 NCLAT CK 1643

Festivity Realtors Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. vs Union of India

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi · Decided on 6 May 2026

HON’BLE JUDGES
Justice Yogesh Khanna, Member (Judicial) · Mr. Ajai Das Mehrotra, Member (Technical)
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Company Appeal (AT) No. 80 of 2026 & I.A. No. 1678 of 2026

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

13 paragraphs · 470 words

(Hybrid Mode)

This appeal is filed against an order dated 11.11.2025 passed by the Ld. NCLT, New Delhi, Bench IV in Company Petition (CAA) No. 23/ND/2021 wherein new Restoration Application No. 57/ND/2025 filed for restoration of the said company petition, dismissed vide order dated 07.10.2025, was also dismissed on the ground there exist no valid reasons in the affidavit to condone the delay and to recall the order dated 07.10.2025.

2.

The Regional Director is also present and we have heard him.

3.

On 11.09.2025, the Ld. NCLT has passed the following order:

“On perusal of the contents of the petition filed by the petitioner companies, it is stated in Para 1.12 and 2.12 which is reproduced hereunder:-

“That as on the date of this Petition, no proceeding for inspection, inquiry or investigation under the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 or under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956, is pending against the Transferor Company and the Transferee Company.”

However, as per the requirement of Section 230(2)(a) of the Companies Act, 2013, the affidavit shall disclose about the pendency of any investigation or proceedings against the company.

Therefore, the petitioner companies are directed to file an appropriate additional separate affidavit of each company in compliance of Section 232(2)(a) within a week.

List the matter on 07.10.2025”

4.

As per the above order, the Ld. NCLT was of the view an affidavit needs to be filed by the appellant qua pendency of any investigation or proceedings against the company. Such affidavit could not be filed on or before the next date viz 07.10.2025 and for this reason, the Company Petition (CAA)23/ND/2021 was dismissed for non-compliance.

5.

It is the submission of the Ld. Counsel for the appellant though affidavit was ready but due to oversight of the legal counsel of the petitioner companies, the additional affidavit could not be filed within the stipulated period and the omission was purely inadvertent and unintentional and not due to any negligence or deliberate non-compliance.

6.

Considering the facts, it was the second motion petition and in paras 1.12 and 2.12 of the petition it was duly mentioned that as on the date of the petition, no proceedings or investigations under the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 or under the Companies Act, 1956 was pending against any of the company and further considering the submissions in para 7 of the New Restoration Application/57/ND/2025, we allow this application and set aside the impugned order. Alongwith this the order dated 07.10.2025 is also set aside subject to payment of cost of Rs. 50,000/- to be deposited in the Prime -3-Minister’s National Relief Fund. The company petition before Ld. NCLT is thus restored to its original number.

7.

The appeal is disposed of in terms of the above. Pending application(s), if any, are also disposed of.