High CourtsSingle Bench(2024) 08 DEL CK 1791

Faeem & Ors. vs The State (GNCT Of Delhi) & Anr.

Delhi High Court · Decided on 2 August 2024

HON’BLE JUDGES
Anoop Kumar Mendiratta, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
W.P.(CRL) 2330/2024

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

14 paragraphs · 413 words

ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA, J (ORAL)

CRL.M.A. 22780/2024

Exemption allowed, subject to just exceptions.

Application stands disposed of.

W.P.(CRL) 2330/2024

1.

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (‘BNSS’) has been preferred on behalf of the petitioners for quashing of FIR No.0778/2022, under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC and Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, registered at P.S. Seemapuri and proceedings emanating therefrom.

2.

Issue notice. Learned ASC for the State and learned counsel for respondent No.2 along with respondent No. 2 in person appear on advance notice and accept notice.

3.

In brief, as per the case of the petitioners, Nikah between petitioner No.1 and respondent No. 2 was solemnized according to Muslim rites and ceremonies on 23.10.2017. A male child was born out of the wedlock. Due to temperamental differences, petitioner No.1 and respondent No.2 started living separately. Present FIR was registered on complaint of respondent No.2 on 16.09.2022.

4.

The disputes are stated to have been amicably settled between the parties in terms of the Settlement/Compromise Deed dated 15.09.2023 arrived at Delhi Mediation Centre, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi. Petitioner No.1 and respondent No.2 are thereafter stated to be residing together.

5.

Learned ASC for the State submits that in view of amicable settlement between the parties, he has no objection in case the FIR in question is quashed.

6.

All petitioners except petitioner No.5 (through VC) and respondent No. 2 in person, have been identified by ASI Gajraj Singh, P.S.: Seemapuri. I have interacted with the parties and they confirm that the matter has been amicably settled between them without any threat, pressure or coercion. Respondent No. 2 also states that nothing remains to be further adjudicated upon between the parties and she has no objection in case the FIR in question is quashed.

7.

Considering the facts and circumstances, since the matter has been amicably settled between the parties, no useful purpose shall be served by keeping the case pending. Continuation of proceedings would be nothing but an abuse of the process of Court. The chances of conviction are bleak in view of amicable settlement between the parties. Consequently, FIR No. 0778/2022, under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC and Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, registered at P.S.: Seemapuri and the proceedings emanating therefrom stand quashed.

Petition is accordingly disposed of. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.

A copy of this order be forwarded to learned Trial Court for information.