High CourtsSingle Bench(2001) 08 MAD CK 0043

Ezaz Tanning Co. vs State of Tamil Nadu and Others

Madras High Court · Decided on 8 August 2001 · Citation: (2002) 92 FLR 389 : (2002) 1 LLJ 506

HON’BLE JUDGES
P.K. Misra, J
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition No''s. 8383 and 13393 of 1995

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

26 paragraphs · 476 words

P.K. Misra, J.—The petitioner has filed this writ application seeking to quash the Government Order in G.O. Ms. 2D No. 19, Labour and

Employment Department dated August 21, 1990, wherein the minimum wages payable to the workmen engaged in footwear making industry was

included.

2.

It is stated that though the Government Order is not applicable to the petitioner concerned as it is not engaged in footwear making industry and it

is only engaged in manufacturing leather garments, the authorities had frequently been calling upon the petitioner to comply with the order relating to

payment of minimum wages.

3.

It is not necessary to decide the question relating to the validity of the Government Order as the petitioner''s industry is not covered by the

Government Order. In the Schedule to the Minimum Wages Act, by G.O. Ms. No. 2367, Labour, dated November 14, 1986, the, employment in

the footwear making industry was included and subsequently by G.O. Ms. No. 2545, dated November 25, 1986, the Schedule was again

amended and employment in leather goods manufacturing was included.

4.

Thus, it is obvious that in the Schedule, two separate orders have been passed to cover the persons employed in footwear making industry and

the persons employed in leather goods manufacturing. Subsequently, under the 2 impugned Government Order, the employment in footwear

making industry was included in Part I of the Minimum Wages Act. It is admitted that the Government had constituted an Advisory Committee u/s

5(1)(a)2 of the Minimum Wages Act for considering the question of revising the minimum wages.

5.

The impugned Government Order reads thus:

The Government have carefully considered the recommendations made in the report of the Committee in the light of the remarks of the

Commissioner of Labour and they have decided to fix minimum rates of wages for the employment in footwear making industry.

6.

Since in the Schedule, the employment in the footwear making industry and the employment in leather goods manufacturing are considered

separately and the impugned Government Order dated August 21, 1990, specifically relates to the employment in footwear making industry, there

cannot be any doubt that the revised wages payable would not be applicable to the employment in other industries such as leather goods

manufacturing or leather garments manufacturing.

7.

In such view of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of with an observation that as the petitioner is not engaged in footwear making industry,

the Government Order dated August 21, 1990, to revising the minimum wages payable to the employees in footwear making industry, would not

be applicable to the petitioner''s industry. It is made clear that the question of validity of the Government Order has not been considered and has

been left open.

8.

Subject to the aforesaid revision, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, the connected W. M. P. is dismissed.