High CourtsDivision Bench(2025) 08 DEL CK 1912

Ex-Naik Ajay Kumar vs Union Of India & Ors.

Delhi High Court · Decided on 13 August 2025

HON’BLE JUDGES
C. Hari Shankar, J · Om Prakash Shukla, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
W.P.(C) 12185/2025, CM APPL. 49678/2025

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

13 paragraphs · 242 words

C.Hari Shankar, J.

1.

The order impugned in this writ petition reads thus:

“MA 2781/2024

This is an application filed seeking early hearing of OA 2599/2023.

In out considered view, no case is made out for out of turn hearing.

2.

MA stands dismissed.”

2.

We are flabbergasted that such an order has been made subject matter of a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

3.

It is not for this Court to decide the sequence of hearings by the Armed Forces Tribunal1 of the cases pending before it. We are conscious of the fact that the AFT is dealing with a large volume of work and are sanguine that the AFT is duly prioritising matters as per its roster and the urgency of the cause involved.

4.

There is no question of this Court interfering with the order passed by the AFT, which has not deemed it appropriate to grant early hearing to the petitioner.

5.

The petitioner can only expect consideration of his case as per its seniority, and the urgency of the cause, keeping in view the number of matters pending before the AFT. The petitioner cannot seek any preferential treatment over other litigants whose cases may be of greater seniority.

6.

In any event, the AFT alone can take a view in that regard. It has done so, and we see no cause to interfere.

7.

The writ petition is accordingly dismissed.

Footnotes

  1. 1.“AFT”, hereinafter