High CourtsDivision Bench(2022) 02 DEL CK 0133

EX Const (Crew) Sharad Dixit vs Union Of India & Ors

Delhi High Court · Decided on 7 February 2022

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manmohan, J · Navin Chawla, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Petition No. 2281 Of 2022

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

11 paragraphs · 292 words

Manmohan, J

C.M.No.6564/2022

Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

Accordingly, the application stands disposed of.

W.P.(C) No.2281/2022

1.

The petition has been heard by way of video conferencing.

2.

Present writ petition has been filed challenging the dismissal order dated 07th December 2021 passed by the Respondents. Petitioner also seeks a direction to the Respondents to conduct a re-verification of the Petitioner’s Swimming Certificates which had been done for two similarly situated personnel.

3.

Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that vide the impugned dismissal order dated 07th December 2021, the Petitioner has been unlawfully dismissed from the Border Security Force under Rule 17 of the BSF Rules, 1979 after serving for 6 years and 5 months on the ground of presenting a fake/ forged Swimming Certificate.

4.

Mr.Hemendra Singh, Law Officer, BSF raises a preliminary objection with regard to the maintainability of the present writ petition on the ground that the Petitioner has an alternative effective remedy by filing a petition under Rule 28A of the BSF Act, 1969.

5.

Mr.Ajit Kumar Kakkar, learned counsel for the Petitioner candidly admits that the Petitioner has not filed a petition under Rule 28A of the BSF Act till date.

6.

Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the Petitioner to file a petition under Rule 28A of the BSF Act, 1969 within a week.  In the event such a petition is filed within the stipulated period, the same shall not be dismissed on the ground of limitation and shall be decided on merit by way of a reasoned order within twelve weeks.  It is clarified that this Court has not commented on the merits of the controversy. The rights and contentions of all the parties are left open.