High CourtsDivision Bench(2023) 09 DEL CK 4025

Eversub India Private Limited vs Dispute Resolution Panel 2 The Secretariat & Ors.

Delhi High Court · Decided on 6 September 2023

HON’BLE JUDGES
Rajiv Shakdher, J · Girish Kathpalia, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
W.P.(C) 11847/2023 & W.P.(C) 11879/2023

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

19 paragraphs · 358 words

RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.: (ORAL)

CM Appl.46272/2023 in W.P.(C) 11847/2023

CM Appl.46359/2023 in W.P.(C) 11879/2023

1.

Allowed, subject to just exceptions.

W.P.(C) 11847/2023

W.P.(C) 11879/2023

2.

Issue notice.

2.1

Mr Sanjeev Menon, learned standing counsel, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents/revenue,

3.

In view of the directions that we propose to pass, Mr Menon says that no counter-affidavit is required to be filed in the matters, and that he will rely on the record presently available with the court.

4.

Therefore, with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the writ petitions are taken up for final hearing and disposal, at this stage itself.

5.

The prayers made in the writ petitions articulate the grievance of the petitioner.

5.1

Briefly put, the grievance of the petitioner is that for the Assessment Years (AYs) in issue, i.e, AY 2017-18 [W.P.(C) 11847/2023] and AY 2018-19 [W.P.(C) 11879/2023], rectification applications filed have not been disposed of as yet.

5.2

It is contended that in W.P.(C) 11847/2023, qua the DRP’s order dated 12.01.2022, a rectification application was filed as far back as on 25.01.2022. As per the petitioner, this rectification application was heard on 23.08.2022. The petitioner claims that no decision has been rendered until today.

6.

Likewise, insofar as the grievance articulated in W.P.(C) 11879/2023 is concerned, it is averred that the rectification application was filed on 13.04.2022 vis-a-vis the DRP’s order dated 18.02.2022.

6.1

The petitioner claims that this application was also heard on 23.08.2022 and since then, no decision has been rendered in the said application.

7.

According to us, this is an unacceptable state of affairs. If what the petitioner asserts is correct, the decision in the applications should have been rendered in a reasonable time. Although more than one year has passed, there is no decision rendered in the above-mentioned rectifications applications.

8.

Accordingly, the concerned officer is directed to dispose of the rectification applications within four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the order passed today.

9.

The writ petitions are disposed of, in the aforesaid terms.

10.

Parties will act based on the digitally signed copy of the order.