High CourtsDivision Bench(1915) 03 MAD CK 0013

Era Dodda Basappa vs Rama Reddi

Madras High Court · Decided on 25 March 1915 · Citation: AIR 1916 Mad 1054(2) : 29 Ind. Cas. 505

HON’BLE JUDGES
John Wallis, C.J · Seshagiri Aiyar, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 143 words
1.

We do not think that under the Will which required everything to be done in accordance with the opinion of the majority of the executors, three

executors could bind the estate by a contract entered into by them without reference to the others. This is the rule where a majority of trustees have

power to act. See Kumban v. Moorthi 7 Ind. Cas. 422 : 20 M.L.J. 951 : (1910) M.W.N. 359 : 8 M.L.T. 208 : 34 M.P 406, and we see no

reason why the same principle should not apply to a majority of executors authorised to act under a Will. We do not think Section 92 of the

Probate and Administration Act has any application as it is overridden by the express provisions of the Will to which it is made subject.

2.

The appeal is dismissed with costs.