High CourtsDivision Bench(1911) 03 BOM CK 0001

Emperor vs Suleman Ibrahim Nakhuda

Bombay High Court · Decided on 2 March 1911 · Citation: (1911) 13 BOMLR 201

HON’BLE JUDGES
N.G. Chandavarkar, J · Heaton, J
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Reference No. 107 of 1910

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 37 words

Heaton, J.—I agree. I cannot see that the commitment is illegal. It may be convenient or it may be indiscreet, but we are only concerned with the question of illegality. Therefore, I agree with the order proposed.