High CourtsSingle Bench(1917) 02 AHC CK 0021

Emperor vs Chote Lal

Allahabad High Court · Decided on 8 February 1917 · Citation: (1917) ILR (All) 367

HON’BLE JUDGES
George Knox, J
RESULT
Dismissed

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 124 words

George Knox, J.—While I think that in every case, whether u/s 195 or Section 476 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the particular statement when the offence refers to a statement, should be set out so that the accused person should not be taken by surprise, but should clearly know what is the statement which he is required to meet, I am not prepared to hold that the non-specification of the statement is a material irregularity. The law does not, so far as I can find out, require that the statement should be set out, and in the present case there can be no room for doubt what is the statement which the accused person has to meet. I dismiss the application with costs.