High CourtsDivision Bench(2012) 06 CAL CK 0011

E.C. Bose and Company Pvt. Ltd. vs Commissioner of Service Tax

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 12 June 2012 · Citation: (2013) 295 ELT 41

HON’BLE JUDGES
Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta, J · Asim Kumar Mondal, J
CASE NUMBER
CEXA No. 9 of 1012 and GA No. 1466 of 2012

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 291 words
1.

Dispensing with all formalities, we take up the application as well as the appeal for final hearing. We have heard Dr. Chakraborty and Mr. Bhardwaj. We have gone through the impugned judgment of the learned Tribunal. We think that when the application for modification was made, the same should have been dealt with either by passing an appropriate order or by rejecting the same. We think that the appeal should not have been dismissed. However, when we notice that the appeal was taken up for hearing on several days and the appellant did not bother to appear to press the appeal and the learned Tribunal suo motu passed an order asking the appellant to deposit the entire amount, we think that the deposit of the entire amount would be too harsh. We therefore set aside the impugned order before us and we pass following order.

2.

In the event the appellant deposits 50% of the basic amount of tax in terms of the earlier order of the learned Tribunal and the balance 50% thereof is secured by furnishing a bank guarantee of a nationalised bank in favour of the Commissioner of Service Tax within a fortnight from the date of receipt of the copy of this order then the appeal itself would be heard on merit in accordance with law and all points are kept open.

3.

In the event no deposit as above is made nor any bank guarantee is furnished, the order passed by the learned Tribunal which is impugned before us will stand revived.

4.

The application along with the appeal according stand disposed of. Urgent xerox certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities.