High CourtsDivision Bench(1911) 11 CAL CK 0001

Dukhimoni Dasi vs Tulsi Charan

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 24 November 1911 · Citation: 13 Ind. Cas. 512

HON’BLE JUDGES
Lawrence Jenkins, C.J · N. Chatterjea, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 102 words

Lawrence Jenkins, C.J.—Having regard to Section 116 of the Evidence Act the defendant cannot be permitted to deny that the plaintiff had a title to the possession of the land at a time when the license was given to enter into possession. In the circumstances a suit for use and occupation would lie. There is no question as to the amount due on that basis; it is Rs. 40 and there will be a decree for that amount with costs. The plaintiff will have the costs of the Rule which is made absolute. We assess the hearing fee at one gold mohur.