High CourtsSingle Bench(2021) 06 KL CK 0083

D.Swathi Vigneswari vs Sub Registrar

High Court Of Kerala · Decided on 7 June 2021

HON’BLE JUDGES
Bechu Kurian Thomas, J
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (C) No. 6442 Of 2021

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

10 paragraphs · 184 words

Bechu Kurian Thomas, J

1.

Learned Government Pleader submits that a statement has already been filed. It is not seen incorporated. Registry shall incorporate the same as

early as possible. However, in view of Ext.P3, it is submitted that further instructions are required and it may even necessitate an additional statement

to be filed. The learned Government Pleader seeks two weeks time. Taking into account the issue arising in the case, the request is reasonable.

2. Petitioners' counsel expressed his apprehension about the expiry of time period for registration of the document produced as Ext.P2. It is noticed

that a bonafide legal contention has been raised by the petitioners, which has arisen on account of the refusal of the 1st respondent to register Ext.P2

document. If petitioners ultimately succeed in this writ petition, they shall not be prejudiced for raising this dispute, that too, without delay.

3. Since the writ petition has been pending before this Court from 10.3.2021, petitioners will be eligible to exclude the time period from 10.3.2021 till

29.6.2021 while calculating the period for registration of the document.

Post on 29.6.2021.