High CourtsSingle Bench(2010) 05 SHI CK 0065

Dr. Y.D. Bansal vs State of H.P. and Others

High Court Of Himachal Pradesh · Decided on 18 May 2010

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sanjay Karol, J
CASE NUMBER
CWP (T) No. 5493 of 2008

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

18 paragraphs · 335 words

Sanjay Karol, J.—Petitioner is aggrieved of the order dated 5.9.1997.

2.

In terms of letter dated 5.3.1997 Petitioner was communicated the following entries made in his ACR:

Overall assessment of Overall performance Fair performance and qualities. Tends to evade responsibility.

3.

He made a detailed representation (Annexure D/1) which stands rejected by the Respondents in terms of impugned order dated 5.9.1997 which, as translated by the Petitioner, reads as under:

To Dr. Y. D. Bansal, Senior Lecturer, (Swasthvritta) RG Govt. Ayu College, Paprola, Distt. Kangra (HP)

Subject:

ADVERSE REMARKS IN ACR OF Dr. Y.D. BANSAL, Sr. Lecturer of SWASTHVRITTA DEPARTMENT FOR THE YEAR 1995-96.

Memo,

With reference to your representation No. GAC/SWA/1997-98 dt. 31/3/1997 on the abovecited subject. The Govt. has decided after consideration that adverse remarks entered in your ACR for the year 1995-96 would stand in same way. (Sic Should be remains as it is.)

/ Additional Director Ayurveda, H.P. Shimla Dated 5/9/1997

No. above.

(1) Copy to: The Administrator, RG Govt. Ayurvedic College Paprola, Dist. Kangra (HP) - for information.

(2) Copy to: Abovesaid in confidential file.

Sd/- Additional Director Ayurveda, H.P. Shimla

4.

Undoubtedly, this order does not assign any reason. Even the contentions raised by the Petitioner in his representation have not been dealt with at all. In these circumstances, the order dated 5.9.1997 is quashed. The Respondents are directed to pass a fresh order by assigning detailed reasons.

5.

Material already placed on record by the Petitioner shall be considered and dealt with. My attention has also been invited to various decisions of the Apex Court as also the High Courts. It shall be open for the Petitioner to also place additional material if need so arises. I have not dealt with the issues raised by the Petitioner in the present petition. It shall be open for the Petitioner to urge the same before the appropriate authority.

6.

Liberty reserved to approach the Court if need so arises.

7.

With the aforesaid observations, the present petition is disposed of.