High CourtsSingle Bench(2020) 11 MP CK 0155

Dr. Sumit vs Dr. Priyanka Through Father Shri Ajay Gautam

Madhya Pradesh High Court · Decided on 27 November 2020

HON’BLE JUDGES
Vivek Rusia, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Miscellaneous Petition No. 3182 Of 2020

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

17 paragraphs · 343 words

Vivek Rusia, J

Heard learned counsel for the parties through video conferencing. Petitioner has filed the present petition seeking temporary custody of his daughter

for the purpose of attending the marriage function in his family between 27.11.2020 to 30.11.2020. For the aforesaid purpose, petitioner filed an

application before the Family Court in a pending proceeding but the Family Court has deferred the hearing after 30.11.2020, therefore, petitioner has

approached this Court by way of this petition.

Although in the application (IA No.3537/2020) various reasons have been given seeking temporary custody of the child. The petitioner has also filed a

petition under section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act. Petitioner and respondent entered into the wedlock on 24.07.2009 and lived together for almost 10

years, the respondent gave birth to a girl child on 06.05.2012 and at present she is 8 years old. Shri Jain, learned Senior Counsel submits that she is not

well, hence it would be risky to take her from Indore to Ujjain in order to attend the marriage ceremony during this Corona pandemic period.

Shri Bhargava, learned counsel submits that petitioner and respondent both are qualified doctors by profession and the petitioner will take care of his

daughter and if her daughter cannot come alone respondent is also invited along with her to attend the marriage ceremony. The petitioner has

mentioned the name of respondent and daughter in the marriage invitation card also.

Although during this epidemic period order for the temporary custody of the girl child for 3 days for attending marriage is not advisable, however,

Mr.Jain, learned Senior Counsel undertakes that he will pursue the respondent to attend the marriage in the family of the petitioner along with the child

and that would also be helpful for maintaining better relations between them in future. This Court hopes and trusts that Shri Jain will make serious

efforts to see that the respondent attends the marriage along with her daughter in the family of the petitioner at least on 30th November, 2020.

With the aforesaid, this petition stands disposed of.