High CourtsSingle Bench(2021) 07 CHH CK 0087

Dr. Rakesh Mishra vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh High Court · Decided on 27 July 2021

HON’BLE JUDGES
Goutam Bhaduri, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Miscellaneous Criminal Case No. 399 Of 2021

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

26 paragraphs · 503 words
1.

This application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been filed by the applicant apprehending his arrest in connection with

Crime No. 111/2020 registered at Police Station Supela, Bhilai, District Durg for the offence punishable under Sections 384, 467, 468, & 471 of the

Indian Penal Code.

2.

As per the prosecution case, the applicant who projected himself to be the President of International Human Rights Justice Federation showing that

it is affiliated to United Nations and International Bar Association, which is not recognized by Government of India and in order to counter certain

complaint demanded money from the objector/complainant Rajeev and threatened that if the money is not paid he would continue to publish the news.

It is alleged that the applicant has falsely used the mono which is not affiliated or recognized by any government body but to blackmail the people has

misused the emblem. It is the further case of the prosecution that the applicant is showing himself as doctorate but actually has not obtained the same.

3.

Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that the Smriti Grih Nirman Sahkari Sanstha Maryadit of which the objector/complainant was a

President certain irregularities were highlighted, therefore, in order to counter, false allegations have been attributed and the applicant do not deny the

fact that he has used the emblem of International Justice Federation which is an existing body, therefore, the applicant may be given the benefit of

anticipatory bail.

4.

Per contra, learned State counsel opposes the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail and would submit that the nature of allegation requires

investigation as serious allegations have been made that the applicant claims to be the member of a NGO/Institution which is affiliated to the

Government whether actually it is affiliated or not is required to be investigated, therefore, the custodial interrogation of the applicant would be

required.

5.

Learned counsel for the objector vehemently opposes the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the applicant and would submit that on the

false pretext the applicant claims himself to be the member and President of Human Rights Justice Federation and claims that it is recognized by the

International Bar Association but it is actually not and it is a recognized NGO to said Justice Federation has not been shown, therefore, on the fake

identity the amount is being claimed for.

6.

Perused the voluminous documents placed in the case. The stand of the State is that whether the International Human Rights Justice Federation

legally exist or not required to be ascertained and on the contrary the complainant stated that the applicant has misused his position to blackmail people

in the name of NGO. Therefore, taking into the nature of allegations, the documents and the submission, it appears that this case may required

custodial interrogation as the authenticity of certain documents are required to be seized and verified. Under these circumstances, I am not inclined to

allow this anticipatory bail application.

7.

Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is dismissed.