High CourtsDivision Bench(2020) 12 DEL CK 0177

Dr. Mohan Reddy R & Anr. vs Jaladi Prasuna & Ors

Delhi High Court · Decided on 16 December 2020

HON’BLE JUDGES
Dhirubhai Naranbhai Patel, CJ · Prateek Jalan, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Letter Patent Appeal No. 387 Of 2020

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

24 paragraphs · 370 words

D.N.Patel, CJ

Proceedings in the matter have been conducted through video conferencing.

C.M.No.33159/2020 (exemptions)

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

The application is disposed of.

C.M.No.33160/2020 (delay of 13 days in filing LPA)

For the reasons stated in the application, the delay in filing the appeal is condoned.

The application is disposed of.

LPA387/2020 & C.M. 33161/2020(stay)

1.

This appeal has been preferred by Respondents No.3 and 4 in W.P.(C)No.3706/2020 aggrieved by an order dated 23rd October, 2020 (Annexure

P-1 to the memo of the LPA) passed in the said writ petition.

2.

Having heard the learned counsel for the appellants and looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, it appears that this appeal has been filed

against the order dated 23rd October, 2020, which is an interim order, and the writ petition being W.P.(C) No.3706/2020 is still pending adjudication

before the learned Single Judge. The next date of hearing fixed before the learned Single Judge is 6th January, 2021.

3.

The said writ petition has been preferred by the petitioner against implementation and operation of the order dated 20th August, 2020 passed by the

Adjudicating Authority under the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988 (as amended by the Amendment Act, 2016). The said order

has been stayed by the learned Single Judge till the next date of hearing, that is, 6th January, 2021.

4.

Much has been argued by the learned counsel for the appellant about the contentions which are raised in the writ petition, including to the effect

that the impugned order dated 20th August, 2020 is an appealable order under Section 46 of the said Act. This contention can always be raised before

the learned Single Judge in the pending writ petition.

5.

In view of the aforesaid facts and also looking to the fact that this appeal is against an interim order and the writ petition is pending adjudication

before the learned Single Judge and coming up for further hearing on 6th January, 2021, we see no reason to entertain this LPA at this stage. We

expect that the parties shall not seek any unnecessary adjournments before the learned Single Judge.

6.

The appeal is, accordingly, disposed of along with the pending application.