High CourtsDIVISON BENCH(2017) 03 BOM CK 0261

Dr. Jairam Karmalkar vs State of Goa Through the Chief Secretary, & Ors.

Bombay High Court · Decided on 3 March 2017

HON’BLE JUDGES
Anoop V. Mohta, C. V. Bhadang
CASE NUMBER
31 of 2012

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 184 words
1.

Heard learned Counsel for both the parties.

2.

Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. By consent heard forthwith.

3.

The statement recorded in order dated 09/09/2014 itself that the sole petitioner has expired. Till this date, no steps whatsoever are taken in the matter. Even otherwise, the prayers in the petition are for referring to the events which took place in the year 2012 whereby certain permissions were granted to the respondent to conduct music festival / fashion show. The interim relief so prayed was not even granted. In view of these, all the events, rests upon the license/permission already took place. The matter is pending since 2012. Called out from final hearing board.

4.

In view of the above, we see no reason to keep this PIL pending. Shri S.D. Lotlikar, learned Advocate General made a statement that in other matters certain guidelines are issued to deal with such music festival/ fashion show. Therefore, taking overall view of the matter and without going into the issues raised, we are incline to dispose of this petition as infructuous.

5.

Rule stands discharged. No costs.