High CourtsSingle Bench(2017) 08 MEG CK 0007

Dr. Arun Kumar Mehta, S/o Late Sri Ram Krishna Mehta vs The Union of India, Represented by the Secretary of Home Affairs

Meghalaya High Court · Decided on 28 August 2017

HON’BLE JUDGES
S.R.Sen
CASE NUMBER
88 of 2016

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

22 paragraphs · 412 words
1.

Heard Mr. R.Jha, learned counsel on behalf of the petitioner as well as Mr. K.Paul, learned CGC on behalf of the respondent.

2.

The petitioner''s case in a nutshell is that:

The instant writ is preferred by the petitioner challenging the in action and denial of grant of Transport allowances to the petitioner.

The factual matrix of the instant case is that the petitioner came on posting from CRPF and joined Assam Rifles, Composite Hospital

on 02nd April 2014 as Medical Superintendent/DIG medical. The petitioner submitted application on 07th October 2014 to the

respondent authorities for sanction of transport allowances w.e.f. 01st September 2014 which was returned by the respondent on

19th December 2014 on the ground that the officer has been provided with dedicated Staff car.

The petitioner again submitted representation dated 02nd June 2015 stating the provisions of Govt. of India, Ministry of Finance

notification, and also stated that Staff car is applicable only to the grade pay of Rs. 10,000/- and the petitioner is in the grade pay of

Rs. 8900/- and the staff car is not authorized up to the petitioners grade pay (Rs. 8900/-).

The respondent did not agree with the said explanation and returned the application stating the demand is not justified. Inspite of

admission and publication of Office order dated 27th September 2014. The petitioner being aggrieved and left with no other option is

preferring this instant petition for grant of transport allowances.

3.

Mr. R.Jha, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he came on posting from CRPF and joined the Assam Rifles Composite Hospital on

02-04-2014 as Medical Superintendent/DIG Medical and was allotted an official car. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner is not

interested in the official car and would rather want his conveyance allowance.

4.

In reply, Mr. K.Paul, learned CGC submits that he is not entitled for an official car as well as conveyance allowance both at a time.

5.

I agree with the submission made by the learned CGC and direct the petitioner to make a proper representation to the authority concerned. The

authority concerned is directed to allow him to draw the conveyance allowance as per his entitlement, instead of providing him with an official car.

Let this whole exercise be completed within a month. Till the petitioner is allowed to draw the conveyance allowance, he should be allowed to use

the official car.

6.

With this observation and direction, this writ petition stands disposed of.