High CourtsDivision Bench(1917) 12 MAD CK 0033

Doraisami Moopan vs Subbalakshmi Palayee Ammal and Others

Madras High Court · Decided on 17 December 1917 · Citation: 46 Ind. Cas. 880 : (1918) 8 LW 205

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sadasiva Aiyar, J · Napier, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 153 words
1.

The agreement in question was not to further prosecute the suit, that is, not to obtain a decree in the suit. The decision in Chidambaram, Chettiar v. Krishna Vathiyar 37 Ind. Cas. 836: 5 L.W. 132 does not apply, as the agreement before decree in that case was to the effect that a decree was to be passed but the decree so obtained was not to be executed.

2.

The question, whether there was an agreement which prevented a decree itself being passed in the suit, cannot be gone into in, execution.

3.

The former decree, however, as against the respondents Nos. 4 to 7 (defendant''s Nos. 5 to 8) has been set aside by the decree in a fresh suit. On this ground this appeal is dismissed against them.

4.

As regards 3rd respondent (4th defendant) the appeal is adjourned till the disposal of the Second Appeal No. 101 of 1917.