High CourtsDivision Bench(1942) 08 MAD CK 0004

District Magistrate of Cuddapah vs Syed Abdul Kareem

Madras High Court · Decided on 18 August 1942 · Citation: AIR 1943 Mad 526

HON’BLE JUDGES
Horwill, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

9 paragraphs · 187 words

Horwill, J.—The accused is said to have made a false allegation against a certain Taluk Office Clerk that he demanded a bribe. The

Collector, who was the superior officer of the clerk concerned, thought that the accused should be prosecuted and ordered the Revenue Divisional

Officer to file a complaint. Two objections were raised during the trial. One was that the Collector should have filed the complaint himself and that

he had no power to delegate that right to the Revenue Divisional Officer. The second ground was that the complaint should have been made to the

Sub-Magistrate having jurisdiction at the place where the Collector received the letter. Both these contentions are correct, but the Sub-Magistrate,

instead of returning the complaint for presentation to the Magistrate having jurisdiction, forwarded the papers to his immediate superior, the Sub-

Divisional Magistrate, Jammalmadugu, u/s 346 (1), Criminal P.C. This was not the proper way to dispose of the matter, and so the District

Magistrate referred the matter to this Court. The reference is accepted and the proceedings of the Sub-Magistrate set aside. He must return the

complaint to the complainant.