AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
Judgment
Horwill, J.—The accused is said to have made a false allegation against a certain Taluk Office Clerk that he demanded a bribe. The
Collector, who was the superior officer of the clerk concerned, thought that the accused should be prosecuted and ordered the Revenue Divisional
Officer to file a complaint. Two objections were raised during the trial. One was that the Collector should have filed the complaint himself and that
he had no power to delegate that right to the Revenue Divisional Officer. The second ground was that the complaint should have been made to the
Sub-Magistrate having jurisdiction at the place where the Collector received the letter. Both these contentions are correct, but the Sub-Magistrate,
instead of returning the complaint for presentation to the Magistrate having jurisdiction, forwarded the papers to his immediate superior, the Sub-
Divisional Magistrate, Jammalmadugu, u/s 346 (1), Criminal P.C. This was not the proper way to dispose of the matter, and so the District
Magistrate referred the matter to this Court. The reference is accepted and the proceedings of the Sub-Magistrate set aside. He must return the
complaint to the complainant.
